zzdcar
Home
/
Reviews
/
Ford Endeavour 4x4 AT vs Toyota Fortuner 4x4 AT: Comparison Review
Ford Endeavour 4x4 AT vs Toyota Fortuner 4x4 AT: Comparison Review-April 2024
2023-12-14 EST 02:30:17

Introduction

I can totally see the charm in buying a Toyota Fortuner. I am driving one that has done over 25,000km; and hard ones at that since this is a media car. But, there isn’t a rattle, a squeak, or any issue whatsoever that I can point out marking its age. It’s almost like a new car minus the glow on the outside but enough and more on the well-used steering wheel. And that myth about other road users moving out of your way when in a Fortuner? Well, that’s true. No wonder, Toyota has been shipping over 1000 units a month of this mammoth, full sized SUV for years now.

However, last two months have seen a dent in its popularity. The reason? Launch of the all-new Ford Endeavour. And by all-new, we actually do mean all-new. From the chassis to the body to the suspension to the engines and even the interiors, have all been improved by leaps and bounds. This new Endeavor then, is in the truest sense, a generation upgrade.

So how do these towering SUVs compare? To find out we have both the SUVs in 4x4 automatic trims, the ultimate expression of capability and convenience.

Hulking good looks?

Hulking, yes. Intimidating even. But good? Maybe not. These are old-school body-on-ladder frame SUVs. So, winning beauty contests isn’t on top of their agenda. Between the two, the Fortuner is the older car and it looks a little jaded. The metal work, the stance and even the various design elements have ‘aged’, but not in a good way.

The Endeavour with its lower roofline, curvier panels, more bling all round and those 18-inch wheels, looks more up-to-date.

More so, when you step inside. The new Endeavour uses leather, metal inserts, and plastic that looks more expensive than one used on the Fortuner. Even the design of the Endeavours’s interior is significantly more modern and pleasing (and it looks like it’s inspired by Land Rovers). The Ford also gets more equipment.

There’s a nice touchscreen multi media system with everything from Bluetooth to a reversing camera and navigation. Plus, it gets three-zone climate control, a more info-rich part-TFT-part-analogue instrumentation, a panoramic sunroof, electric tailgate and electric fold for the last row of seats.

That’s not all. It also gets seven airbags, multi driving modes for better off-roading (again Land Rover inspired) and a self-park feature. All of this is missing on the Fortuner.

What’s also missing on the Toyota is similar amount of interior space. The Endeavour is longer and it sits on a longer wheelbase as well. It is also wider. No wonder when it comes to shoulder and knee room in the second row, the Ford scores higher.

It also has more room upfront. As for the last row of seats, these are equally useless for full sized adults on both cars. It is however easier to access the last row on the Fortuner.

Another plus for the Toyota is the flexibility its second row seat offers. Not only does it split and fold 60:40 like on the Endeavour, but it also reclines all the way back to produce a bed of sorts; something you don’t get in cars twice the price.

Easy to drive?

Not really. Not with that size. But, the Endeavour is the lesser of the two evils. There’s nothing to choose between the two when it comes to visibility – these are tall, wide and equally cumbersome. The Endeavour though has a lighter steering and it feels lighter on the throttle and under braking.

It also has a self park feature which picks a spot between parked cars and then steers into it without the driver having to constantly look left and right, watch the mirrors and then ask his co-occupants to step out and help. To call it convenient would be an understatement.

On the highway though both SUVs are more or less similar. They track fine in a straight line, don’t mind changing lanes in a hurry and shed speed with no drama at all. Take them up on a hilly road though and the Fortuner seems more up to the task. Now both the Endeavour and the Fortuner have no real steering feel, but the Toyota’s unit is better weighed giving the driver a hint more confidence in the SUV’s capabilities. It’s also easier to modulate the Fortuner’s all wheel drive system to return neutral turn in and handling The Endeavour just loves to understeer.

The Toyota is also stiffer of the two in terms of suspension setup. So, at slow speeds over undulating roads, broken surfaces and even road joints one can feel and hear everything that is happening underneath. And because the Fortuner is a ladder based SUV, there’s no getting away from the jiggly ride either.

The Endeavour’s ride is suppler, quieter, and more absorbent. There’s a hint of jiggle to its ride as well but it’s less intrusive compared to the Toyota. However, it’s the less pronounced side-to-side movement over poor roads, which really makes the Ford the more comfortable of the two.

Torque monsters?

Well, these are both diesels. Both displace over 3-litre in capacity. And both churn out almost 350Nm of peak torque. Okay, the Endeavour puts out a lot more. So, yes, these are torquey machines. But, these also weigh in excess of two tonnes; the Endeavour most certainly does while the Fortuner is a fence sitter here. Little wonder both the Endeavour and the Fortuner take over 11 seconds to hit 100kmph.

Between the two, even though the Ford is heavier, it is also the quicker SUV. It takes 11.3 seconds to hit 100kmph while the Fortuner takes 12.1 seconds. But then you’d expect that given that its 3.2-litre diesel engine pumps out 197bhp and a handsome 470Nm of peak torque. The Ford isn’t just quicker under flat out acceleration but in terms of driveability too.

It takes lesser time to complete both the 20-80kmph and the 40-100kmph runs in kickdown. The Endeavour completes the 20-80kmph run in 6.8s while the Toyota takes a second longer. In the 40-100kmph kickdown the difference is nearly two seconds with the Ford wrapping this up in 8.6s. What’s more, it takes lesser distance to come to stop from 80kmph as well!

But, the Ford diesel unit is loud. It has a grainy texture to its note that is more noise than sound. And it is mated to a 6-speed slush ‘box which works like an on/off switch. So, you are either at 3,000rpm making a lot of noise or at idle freewheeling listlessly. It’s a little better in Sport mode but nothing that deserves praise.

More so when you consider that the Ford comes with this while noise cancellation thing, which is supposed to significantly improve NVH. It certainly doesn’t do its job well at high engine rpm, but, when cruising at low revs, yes, the Endeavour is a serene place to be in.

The Fortuner’s gearbox is equally annoying. And it doesn’t even get Sport mode. And it only has five speeds. But, as a saving grace the engine –3-litre, 171bhp, 343Nm four-cylinder diesel – is only as noisy as the Ford; actually it is a little less at full clip. It also feels a little more refined than the Endeavour.

So, as you can tell, neither the Ford nor the Fortuner are great drives with their average auto ‘boxes. And though the Ford is a little quicker, the two are pretty evenly matched otherwise.

Verdict

Ford Endeavour 4x4 AT: Rank 1

Final Score: 376/600

Price: Rs 34.5 lakh, OTR, Mumbai

The all-new Endeavour has rewritten the rules in its class; a class that also has vehicles like the Chevrolet Trailblazer, the Ssangyong Rexton and the Mitsubishi Pajero Sport in addition to the Toyota Fortuner. The Endeavour is younger, better specced, more comfortable, safer (in equipment terms), and the easiest to drive. It is also the only SUV in its segment that can actually be termed as a ‘value-buy’ given the amount of stuff one gets as standard for this price. And it can off-road too. So, if you are still wondering which Rs 30 lakh full sized SUV should you be buying…well, the Endeavour it is.

Toyota Fortuner 4x4 AT: Rank 2

Final Score: 348/600

Price: Rs 33.3 lakh, OTR, Mumbai

The Fortuner was never going to win this contest. It is after all, for all means and purposes, a decade old car. And it shows compared to the new Endeavour. It doesn’t have the quality, the ergonomics, the space or even the premium feel of the Ford. It can’t match the latter on equipment either, be it for comfort and convenience, or safety. And, it is not a whole lot cheaper to buy either; these are only priced a lakh apart. How does one justify that? The one thing that still works in the Fortuner’s favour, nonetheless, is a proven track record.

Photos: Kapil Angane

Specification

CAR NAME Ford Eneavour
Toyota Fortuner
Variant Titanium 3.2 4X4 AT 3.0-litre 4X4 AT
ENGINE
Fuel Diesel Diesel
Installation Front, longitudinal Front, longitudinal
Displacement 5 cyls, 3198cc 4 cyls, 2982cc
Bore/stroke 89.06/100.76mm 96.0/103.0mm
Valve gear 4 valves per cyl DOHC 4 valves per cyl DOHC
Power 197bhp at 3000rpm 169bhp at 3600rpm
Torque 470Nm at 1750rpm 343Nm at 1400rpm
Power to weight 82.33bhp per tonne 84.5bhp per tonne
Torque to weight 196.32Nm per tonne 171.5Nm per tonne
Gearbox 6-speed automatic 5-speed automatic
CHASSIS & BODY
Kerb weight 2394kg 2000kg
Tyres 265/60 R18 265/65 R17
Spare 265/60 R18 265/65 R17
STEERING
Type Rack and pinion Rack and pinion
Type of assist Electric Hydraulic
Turning circle 11.7m 11.8m
BRAKES
Front Ventilated Discs Ventilated Discs
Rear Disc Drums
Anti-lock Yes Yes

Test Data

CAR NAME Ford Endeavour
Toyota Fortuner
Variant Titanium 3.2 4X4 AT 3.0-litre 4X4 AT
PERFORMANCE & BRAKING
0-20kmph 0.78 0.90
0-40kmph 2.24s 2.52s
0-60kmph 4.52s 4.75s
0-80kmph 7.28s 7.87s
0-100kmph 11.31s 12.14s
0-120kmph 16.78s 17.47s
20-80kmph in 3rd gear 6.48s 7.28s
40-100kmph in 4th gear 8.62s 10.7s
80-0kmph 26.15m 29.32m
FUEL ECONOMY
City 7kmpl 7.5kmpl
Highway 10.9kmpl 11.8kmpl
Tank size 80 litres 80 litres
Range 630km 660km
INTERIOR MEASUREMENTS
Front
Legroom(Max/min) 870/610mm 830/600mm
Headroom(Max) 990mm 980mm
Shoulder room 1460mm 1415mm
Backrest height 630mm 520mm
Rear
Headroom 950mm 930mm
1m kneeroom 760mm 730mm
Shoulder room 1460mm 950mm
Knee room 920mm 1405mm
Seat length 480mm 480mm
Backrest height 590mm 520mm
Rear Most
Headroom 880 870
Kneeroom 730 660
Seat length 460 460
Seat back height 540 480
Shoulder room 1120 1375
Boot 510litres(calculated) 732.73litres(calculated)
Depth/width/height 1090/1110/420mm 1070/1070/640mm
Loading lip height 820mm 780mm

Score Sheet

Parameters Max points Ford Endeavour

Toyota Fortuner

DRIVING FEEL
Steering response 20 11 12
Directional stability 25 15 15
Engine characteristics 25 14 13
Gearbox 20 12 12
Visibility 10 6 6
Intermediate results 100 58 58
SPACE
Front Space 25 17 14
Rear space 25 17 15
Feeling of space 20 15 12
Boot space/flexibility 20 17 20
Payload 10 9 9
Intermediate results 100 75 70
IN THE CABIN
Comfort equipment 25 19 14
Operatibility 15 11 10
Feel of quality 20 13 12
Front seats/ingress 20 15 16
Rear seat/ingress 20 14 14
Intermediate results 100 72 66
PERFORMANCE
Acceleration 25 18 16
Top speed 10 7 7
Driveability 30 24 21
Braking 25 20 17
Environment 10 4 4
Intermediate results 100 73 65
ROAD MANNERS
Ride quality 30 21 18
Turning circle 15 12 11
Handling 20 10 11
Manoeuvrability 15 10 9
Safety 20 13 5
Intermediate results 100 66 54
PRICE
Price 45 6 7
Resale 10 6 8
Warranty 10 7 7
Fuel efficiency 35 13 13
Intermediate results 100 32 35
Total 600 376 348

Comments
Welcome to zzdcar comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
Reviews
Kia Sonet 1.0-litre T-GDI Petrol iMT First Drive Review
Kia Sonet 1.0-litre T-GDI Petrol iMT First Drive Review
What is it?Why would I buy it?iMT tech works great with the turbo petrol engine, loaded with featuresWhy would I avoid it?Not the most spacious rear bench, ride quality on the stiffer sideWe have already seen the production-ready Kia Sonet in detail but what remained was the drive experience. We...
Apr 21, 2025
Kia Sonet Diesel Automatic First Drive Review
Kia Sonet Diesel Automatic First Drive Review
What is it?Why should I buy it?Styling, refined and potent powertrain, feature-loaded cabinWhy should I avoid it?Slightly stiff ride, constrained rear-seat space What is it?Currently, the sub-four-metre SUV segment in India is the most crowded one. And car buyers are spoilt for choices more than ever before, yet more are...
Apr 21, 2025
Skoda Karoq First Drive Review
Skoda Karoq First Drive Review
Why would I buy it?Sorted powertrain and dynamicsFit and finishWhy would I avoid it?Too priceyVerdictThe Karoq is appreciated for its fine amalgamation of nippy performance and sure-footed dynamics despite being a mid-sized SUV. Your senses are instantly pampered by the relaxing feature-loaded cabin, the pristine fit and finish, solid build...
Apr 21, 2025
BS6 Skoda Rapid Review: Pros and Cons
BS6 Skoda Rapid Review: Pros and Cons
IntroductionWhat we have here is the BS6 Skoda Rapid. Currently, not the most popular body style, you’d agree, but the driving dynamics of this sedan have their charm. Something I’ve always appreciated through the years. But that aside, what’s really new in this car is what’s under that bonnet. An...
Apr 21, 2025
Renault Duster RXZ 1.3 Turbo Petrol MT First Drive Review
Renault Duster RXZ 1.3 Turbo Petrol MT First Drive Review
What is it?Why I would buy it?Peppy turbo petrol engine, Rides like a charm Why I would avoid it?Dated interiors and feature list The Renault Duster has been a familiar face in the Indian SUV market for nearly a decade now. In that time, there’s been a facelift, an AWD...
Apr 21, 2025
2020 Audi A8L First Drive Review
2020 Audi A8L First Drive Review
What is it?Why would I buy it?Top-notch tech, rear-seat comfort and relaxing massagesWhy would I avoid it?Low ground clearance, no diesel option, expensiveWhat is it?This is the Audi A8L, in which the L denotes a long wheelbase. It's the carmaker's flagship luxury sedan that was launched in India at the...
Apr 21, 2025
Copyright 2023-2025 - www.zzdcar.com All Rights Reserved